Vincent Ray M. Daut (Philippines)
Abstract:
This thesis provides an in-depth examination of how paraconsistent logic can be applied to address theological problems. It starts with a logical prolegomenon by contrasting classical logic with paraconsistent logic, highlighting how paraconsistent logic prevents logical explosion from any contradictions (φ ∧ ¬φ) by rejecting modus ponens, a rule valid in classical logic. The focus then shifts to a metaphysical and logical analysis of the doctrine of the Incarnation. The claim that Christ is both fully human and fully divine, as defined by the Council of Chalcedon, presents a significant ontological dilemma, as these two natures are inherently incompatible and mutually exclusive according to classical logic: On the one hand, human nature is defined by finitude, mutability, and moral fallibility, and divine nature is understood as infinite, immutable, and morally impeccable, on the other. In this regard, the study applies paraconsistent logic to this “contradictory” Christology (Jc Beall), presenting key arguments why this new approach deserves significant philosophical and theological consideration. The study also responds to some objections raised against paraconsistent logic as applied to the theology of the Incarnation.
Final Defense:
Board of Examiners:
- Fr. Oliver Dy, S.J., S.T.D., Ph.D. (Adviser)
- Wilhelm Patrick Joseph Strebel, Ph.D. (Second Reader/Principal Examiner)
- Fr. Marcos Louis Catalan, Jr., S.J., Ph.D.
- Fr. Rowan Rebustillo, S.T.D., Ph.D.
Proposal Defense:
Board of Examiners:
1. Fr. Oliver Dy, S.J., S.T.D., Ph.D. (Adviser)
2. Fr. Rowan Rebustillo, S.T.D., Ph.D.
3. Fr. Marcos Louis Catalan, Jr., S.J., Ph.D.